SaaS and Identity Posture Assessment

The situation

Every platform your business runs on shipped with defaults chosen to get you adopting it quickly, not to keep you safe. Multi-factor authentication got turned on for some accounts and quietly skipped for others. A contractor kept access after the project ended because revoking it was one more task nobody got to. An early employee granted a third-party application permission to read the whole mailbox, and neither the employee nor the application has been looked at since.

None of these choices was reckless on its own. Together they form a shape nobody in your organisation has ever stood back and looked at, because owning that whole picture was never anyone's job. When a customer or an insurer finally asks how your accounts are actually configured, the honest answer today is that nobody knows.

What changes

You get a clear picture of how every platform is actually configured against a recognised baseline, not against what you assumed when it was set up. Multi-factor gaps, administrative privilege sitting with people who no longer need it, external sharing left open, mail rules nobody remembers creating, and every third-party application still holding standing access: all named, all ranked, and all traced back to the account or the approval that put it there.

A default is a decision nobody remembers making, until someone asks who made it.

The plan that follows is sequenced by risk and effort, so your administrators know exactly what to fix first, what can reasonably wait, and what is already safe to leave as it is.

How it runs

1. 01

   Provision read-only access

2. 02

   Review configuration against the baseline

3. 03

   Rank findings by risk and effort

4. 04

   Your team remediates with our review

5. 05

   Re-check and close

Access comes first, and it stays read-only throughout: nothing changes because we are looking at it. We compare your configuration against a recognised baseline covering multi-factor coverage, administrative privilege, external sharing, mail rules, logging and retention, and every connected application still holding standing access, then rank what we find by risk and effort so the list reads as a plan rather than a wall of findings.

Your administrators make every change themselves, working from that ranked list with our guidance available for anything unclear. We review each change as it lands, and once the agreed items are closed, we re-check the whole picture and confirm it against the baseline again before calling the engagement done.

What you receive

You receive the findings themselves, written against the baseline we tested against: what is misconfigured, why it matters, and what a similarly configured account has allowed to happen elsewhere. Alongside them, the remediation plan your own administrators can execute in a week, sequenced so the riskiest gaps close first.

And you receive the re-check: confirmation, after your team has acted, that the changes landed and the picture now matches the baseline. Carry that picture into the governance controls build next, and these findings become the starting inventory for a register that stays current, rather than a report nobody opens again.